Tom Sickenberger vs Christian Sigsgaard Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 13 Oct at 01:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
T. Sickenberger vs C. Sigsgaard

GER
0
Win
Played
1
Win

DEN
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Sickenberger 0 - 1 Sigsgaard
They have played 2 sets in total, with Tom Sickenberger winning 0 and Christian Sigsgaard winning 2. The last match between Christian Sigsgaard and Tom Sickenberger was at the M15 Offenbach, 13-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Christian Sigsgaard getting the victory 7-5 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Sickenberger | 0 |
Sigsgaard | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Offenbach(10-13-25)
T. Sickenberger vs C. Sigsgaard H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
26.32% (5-14) | Career Total W/L | 63.45% (125-72) |
0 | Indoor | 1 |
0 | Titles | 2 |
0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
T. Sickenberger vs C. Sigsgaard Match Preview:
- Recent second serve effectiveness reveals a difference: Tom Sickenberger secures 40.96% of points, while Christian Sigsgaard achieves 48.07%. Does this give Sigsgaard an advantage? Yes, potentially in match prediction accuracy.
- When examining return games, Sigsgaard marginally leads with 40.73% of second serve return points, compared to Sickenberger's 40.50%. However, Sickenberger performs better on first serve returns with 34.84% against Sigsgaard's 30.21%.
- Under pressure, Sigsgaard excels, saving 52.31% of breakpoints, significantly better than Sickenberger’s 39.74%.
- Sigsgaard’s overall win rate is 65.79%, outperforming Sickenberger’s 38.46% in the past year, providing a compelling comparison of their success rates.
- When it comes to playing surfaces, both excel on I.hard with a win rate of 67%, but Sickenberger struggles on clay, winning only 20% of matches.
- Comparing player levels, Sigsgaard holds a remarkable 70.97% win rate in the $10K category, whereas Sickenberger is behind at 38.46%.
- Sickenberger has faced tougher opponents with an average rank of 213.38 in the last 12 months, compared to Sigsgaard’s opponents with an average rank of 394.95.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Sickenberger might have the upper hand, winning 67% of such sets, whereas Sigsgaard's deciding set win rate is 50%.
Editorial Prediction (October 13, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing key performance indicators, Christian Sigsgaard stands out with a stronger second serve and better breakpoint resilience. His superior recent win percentage and effectiveness in lower-tier tournaments further enhance his profile as the potential match favorite.
While Tom Sickenberger displays notable strengths in first serve returns and performance in deciding sets, these advantages might not overcome Sigsgaard's overall statistical superiority.
Given the collected data and recent trends, Christian Sigsgaard is more likely to secure victory in the upcoming tennis match.
Tom Sickenberger vs Christian Sigsgaard Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
T. Sickenberger vs C. Sigsgaard H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
0 | Sets Won | 2 |
8 | Games Won | 13 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
6 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
1:39:10 | Average Match Time | 1:39:10 |
69% (44/64) | 1st Serve % | 68% (46/68) |
64% (28/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (35/46) |
40% (8/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (9/22) |
100% (1/1) | Break Pts Won % | 60% (3/5) |
35% (24/68) | Return Points Win % | 44% (28/64) |
0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
T. Sickenberger Recent Matches Played
C. Sigsgaard Recent Matches Played

T. Sickenberger vs C. Sigsgaard Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
26.32% (5/14) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.45% (125/72) |
28.57% (12/30) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.70% (279/166) |
40.83% (158/229) | Games Win/Loss | 55.23% (2309/1872) |
66.67% (2/1) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.53% (54/31) |
20.00% (3/12) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.30% (38/23) |
0.00% (0/1) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.00% (33/17) |
0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
18 | Aces Total | 443 |
0.28 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
52 | Total Double Faults | 313 |
1:6:29 | Average Match Time | 1:15:30 |
297.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 434.78 |
65% (498/772) | 1st Serve % | 66% (6621/10033) |
57% (286/498) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (4450/6621) |
42% (114/274) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (1806/3412) |
42% (25/59) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (503/1049) |
37% (272/745) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4319/10263) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 37.50% (3/5) |
26.32% (5/14) | Futures W/L | 65.93% (120/62) |
26% (5/19) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (120/190) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 75% (3/4) |
75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (29/52) |
50% (2/4) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (19/48) |
80% (5/4) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (130/112) |
20% (5/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (130/18) |
7% (14/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (67/13) |